Ubisoft is shutting down XDefiant servers amid growing speculation of bankruptcy following a string of high-profile failures.
Ubisoft has announced the closure of its ambitious first-person shooter XDefiant, a game once touted as a “Call of Duty killer.” The decision comes after a rocky launch and dwindling player retention, with servers set to shut down in June 2025. The closure has led to the shuttering of Ubisoft’s San Francisco and Osaka studios, resulting in 277 layoffs. Despite the impending end, the company plans to release Season 3 content, a move criticized as a last-ditch effort to recover monetization.
RELATED: Rockstar Completely Rebuilt GTA Trilogy and Sacked Former Devs
This development marks another blow to Ubisoft after a year marked by poor sales, legal troubles, and significant criticism of its key projects. The closure of XDefiant reflects a broader trend of challenges for the company, as it struggles to find its footing in an increasingly competitive industry.
A String of Failures and Legal Troubles
Ubisoft’s challenges extend beyond the closure of XDefiant, as the company now faces a class-action lawsuit over its handling of The Crew. In March 2024, Ubisoft shut down the servers for The Crew, rendering the game unplayable due to its always-online requirement. This action has led two Californian gamers to file a lawsuit, alleging that Ubisoft misled consumers into believing they owned the game, when in fact they had purchased a revocable license. The plaintiffs argue that Ubisoft’s failure to provide an offline mode or allow third-party server violates consumer protection laws and undermines digital ownership rights.
This legal action has intensified discussions about digital ownership and game preservation, highlighting the frustrations of consumers who lose access to purchased content when servers are decommissioned. The lawsuit seeks monetary compensation for affected players and has gained momentum alongside initiatives like the “Stop Killing Games” campaign, which advocates for sustainable game preservation strategies.
Ubisoft’s decision to shut down The Crew without offering alternatives has drawn significant criticism, further straining the company’s relationship with its player base and raising concerns about its commitment to consumer rights. As Ubisoft navigates these legal challenges, its approach to digital content management and consumer transparency will be closely scrutinized.
Adding to the turmoil, Ubisoft now faces another lawsuit stemming from its decision to shut down the servers for XDefiant. The suit, filed by a coalition of players and digital rights advocates, accuses the company of failing to provide sufficient alternatives for preserving the game. Critics argue that Ubisoft has not only removed the ability for players to access their purchased content but also blocked attempts to migrate the game to third-party servers or offer an offline mode. This has sparked outrage within the gaming community, with many accusing Ubisoft of prioritizing short-term cost-cutting over long-term goodwill.
The legal implications of this decision could set a precedent for how gaming companies handle server shutdowns in the future. Digital ownership advocates have pointed out that Ubisoft’s actions
The Troubled Voyage of Skull and Bones
Ubisoft’s Skull and Bones has become emblematic of the company’s recent struggles, enduring a protracted and troubled development cycle. Initially announced in 2017, the game faced numerous delays and substantial budget overruns, reportedly costing around $200 million. The project underwent multiple redesigns, shifting from a planned expansion of Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag to a standalone title, with its setting evolving from the Caribbean to East Africa and Southeast Asia.
Complicating matters, Skull and Bones received significant subsidies from the Singapore government, obligating Ubisoft to complete the game despite its challenges. This financial entanglement added pressure to deliver a finished product, even as the game’s direction and scope remained in flux.
When Skull and Bones finally launched in February 2024, it was met with mixed reviews. Critics pointed to its lack of engaging content and an overreliance on live-service elements, leading to disappointing reception and underwhelming sales. The game’s failure further highlighted Ubisoft’s difficulties in managing large-scale projects and its inability to meet the expectations of both fans and investors.
Other Triple-A Failures
Adding to the company’s troubles, Star Wars Outlaws, released earlier this year, was met with critical disdain. Critics highlighted its lackluster gameplay, uninspired story, and poor execution of the Star Wars license. Sales were dismal, and the game failed to capitalize on the hype surrounding one of the most beloved franchises in entertainment.
Even Ubisoft’s flagship franchise, Assassin’s Creed, is struggling. The title Assassin’s Creed: Shadows has been delayed indefinitely due to legal disputes over alleged copyright infringement. Early has criticized the game for failing to innovate, further casting doubt on its potential success. The repeated setbacks have raised questions about whether Ubisoft’s marquee franchise can continue to anchor the company’s future.
Is Ubisoft’s Future in Jeopardy?
With a lineup of high-profile flops, legal entanglements, and layoffs, Ubisoft’s future is under scrutiny. The company’s inability to deliver successful live-service titles, compounded by its failure to capitalize on beloved intellectual properties, has eroded player trust and investor confidence.
Dear Players,
— XDefiant (@PlayXDefiant) December 3, 2024
Important message: XDEFIANT IS SUNSETTING!
Thank you for your incredible and dedication to XDEFIANT. We regret to inform you that we are initiating the sunset process starting today, December 3, 2024.
As a result, new s, player registrations and… pic.twitter.com/h0kXRowL5T
Ubisoft’s recent failures have cemented a troubling trajectory, with titles like Star Wars Outlaws and Skull and Bones falling far short of expectations. These games failed to resonate with fans, performing poorly both critically and commercially. Compounding this, Ubisoft has alienated its audience by disregarding fan , offending Japanese gamers, and adopting increasingly anti-consumer practices. Instead of making games for gamers, the company appears more focused on pandering to an ideology, further eroding trust. Once a leader in the industry, Ubisoft now seems to be sinking deeper into irrelevance, with its future as a major gaming powerhouse hanging by a thread.